[Lumiera] Which timecode formats do we want?

Brian Rytel tesla.pictures at gmail.com
Thu Jul 8 10:57:31 CEST 2010


hmm, I'm shocked I wrote 1% rather than .1%, apparently in need of sleep.

B.J.M.R.


On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 1:55 AM, Florian Faber <faber at faberman.de> wrote:

> On 07/08/10 10:52, Brian Rytel wrote:
>
> > Aside from drop-frame there is no reason why the user shouldn't just
> > type in the FRAME RATE they want and the timecode ticker to circulate at
> > the number.
>
> Yes. Any arbitrary frame rate should be allowed.
>
> > Further, we should include a +/- 1% pullup/down because we use that all
> > the time, it makes as much sense as using equivalent fixed quantities.
>
> +/- 0.1%, +/- 4% as well.
>
>
> Flo
> --
> Machines can do the work, so people have time to think.
> public key DA43FEF4          x-hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net
> _______________________________________________
> Lumiera mailing list
> Lumiera at lists.lumiera.org
> http://lists.lumiera.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lumiera
> http://lumiera.org/donations.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lumiera.org/pipermail/lumiera/attachments/20100708/2c6e8873/attachment.htm>


More information about the Lumiera mailing list