[Lumiera] Naming of headers

[Ichthyostega]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Joel Holdsworth schrieb:
> There's a small thing I've noticed that we need to agree on: naming of source
> files. At the moment if I have a header for a class with ClassName, I give
> the file the name class-name.hpp, whereas ichthyo gives headers the name
> classname.hpp. Personally I think my way is more readable, but I don't really
> care - I just want for our source files to have a consistent naming scheme.
> 
> Any thoughts?
At first sight, your naming convention seems to be far more readable than mine.
Are there any foreseeable problems? Do we ever get the situation that the name
of an header needs to be derived automatically, given a class name? Otherwise
I'd say, lets go for it.
I have now several large-scale renaming-and reordering tasks batched up for
Proc, probably a good chance to do them as one combined effort; please give me
some time for this actually to happen... Probably I'll try to land the additions
on the builder branch first, they aren't very intrusive.

Hermann



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJRBGSZbZrB6HelLIRAvD2AJ907gfd5Qa92asTvpLl0g/7JQie3QCeLkY2
k6Lqetnf02ZbXAEdh17pJw0=
=BeaZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----